What are the potential pitfalls of using oci_num_rows in PHP5 for OCI (Oracle) compared to mysql_num_rows in MySQL?
The potential pitfall of using oci_num_rows in PHP5 for OCI (Oracle) compared to mysql_num_rows in MySQL is that oci_num_rows may not work as expected in all situations, especially when dealing with certain types of queries or result sets. To solve this issue, it is recommended to use a different approach to retrieve the number of rows affected by a query in Oracle, such as using a SELECT COUNT(*) query or fetching the rows into an array and counting the elements.
// Using a SELECT COUNT(*) query to retrieve the number of rows affected
$query = "SELECT COUNT(*) FROM your_table WHERE your_condition";
$result = oci_parse($conn, $query);
oci_execute($result);
$row = oci_fetch_array($result);
$num_rows = $row[0];
oci_free_statement($result);
echo "Number of rows affected: " . $num_rows;
Keywords
Related Questions
- In what ways can PHP developers optimize their code for generating PDFs with LaTEX to improve efficiency and performance?
- What potential pitfalls should be considered when implementing a counter with IP blocking in PHP?
- What best practices should be followed when handling file uploads in PHP to avoid errors like duplicate folder creation?